Casesearch

Compared

Casesearch vs Paxton AI, Compared for Small Firms

The short answer

Casesearch and Paxton AI both do AI legal research in plain English, but they aim at different budgets and jobs. Paxton AI is a broad assistant that drafts, reviews documents, and runs deep research, with published pricing at 499 dollars per user per month or 2,999 dollars per year. Casesearch is the focused, lower-cost option for solos and small firms who mainly need fast, cited case law research: ask in plain English and get on-point precedents with plain-language holdings and a still-good-law signal, self-serve from 39 dollars per month.

The research console

Try Casesearch in plain English

Run a real question and see the cited cases, holdings, and good-law signal for yourself.

CASESEARCH · RESEARCH
Try:

Reading opinions

Finding the authorities that answer your question...

Controlling statute

The controlling statute is surfaced alongside the case law so you read the code and the precedents together.

Plain-English answer

Research memo

Question
Short answer
Authorities

Casesearch shows you the sources. Always read the full opinion and verify citations before you rely on them.

Side by side

Casesearch vs Paxton AI, dimension by dimension

Dimension Casesearch Paxton AI
Search style Plain English Plain English
Focus Case law research Broad AI suite (drafting, review, research)
Cited holdings Yes Yes
Good-law signal Yes Partial
Transparent public pricing From 39 per month 499 per user per month
Signup Self-serve, no sales call Self-serve
Built for Solos and small firms on a budget Firms wanting an all-in-one platform

The bottom line

Pick Paxton AI if you want one platform for drafting, document review, and research and the 499 dollar seat fits your budget. Pick Casesearch if case law research is the job to be done and you want cited holdings and a good-law signal at a transparent entry price from 39 dollars per month.

Start now

Try Casesearch on your next question

Plain-English legal research with cited cases, plain-language holdings, and a still-good-law signal. You read the opinion and verify.