CaseSearch
CITATION CHECK

AI Citation Checker and AI Hallucination Checker for Legal Briefs Compared by Price

Courts have now caught more than two thousand filings built on citations an AI made up. Here is every tool that checks a brief for them, what each one actually verifies, and what it costs a US lawyer to run one before filing.

US firms · Research tool, not legal advice

CaseSearch research console
Try:

Reading opinions

Finding the authorities that answer your question...

Sample answer. That question is outside the worked examples this preview ships with, so the authorities below show the format rather than an answer to what you typed. Pick one of the example questions above for a fully worked result.

Controlling statute

The controlling statute is surfaced alongside the case law so you read the code and the precedents together.

Plain-English answer

Research memo

Question
Short answer
Authorities

CaseSearch shows you the sources. Always read the full opinion and verify citations before you rely on them.

The short answer

An AI citation checker reads a brief or motion, pulls out every case citation and confirms that each case exists, that the reporter, volume and page match, and, in the better tools, that the quoted language and the proposition actually appear in the opinion. Published prices for US lawyers run from 19.99 dollars per document (CiteSentinel) and 25 dollars a month for 100 reports (LawDroid CiteCheck AI at launch) to 60 dollars a seat a month billed annually (BriefCatch with RealityCheck) and 300 dollars a user a month (Clearbrief). Westlaw and Lexis+ include brief checkers only inside research plans that start at 114 dollars a month.

2,097

court decisions involving hallucinated AI material in the Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases database, read October 1, 2026

$19.99

per document, the lowest published pay-per-brief price (CiteSentinel)

$60

per seat per month billed annually, BriefCatch Individual with the RealityCheck checker

$24

a month billed yearly for CaseSearch Solo, to find the real case that should replace a bad cite

Side by side

Every AI citation checker a US lawyer can buy, what it verifies and what it costs

Clearbrief, BriefCatch and Benchly read on their own pricing pages, Westlaw and Lexis+ figures from the vendors' online configurator and store, CiteSentinel and the free tools as reported by the ABA Journal on June 22, 2026, and LawDroid CiteCheck AI as announced at launch in June 2025. Checked September 30 to October 1, 2026.

Tool What it checks Published price Best for
CiteSentinel (BrentWorks) Confirms that the case law cited in an uploaded brief is real and valid From $19.99 per document, monthly plans available A lawyer who files a few briefs a month and wants to pay per filing
LawDroid CiteCheck AI Case citations only, checked against CourtListener. Not statutes, regulations or law reviews 5 reports free, then $25 a month for 100 or $100 a month for 500 (launch pricing) High volume, case-only checking on a small budget
BriefCatch with RealityCheck Reporter volume, court and case name validation, plus AI checks that quotes appear in the opinion and support the proposition $60 per seat per month billed annually (Individual), $75 Pro with 5 seat minimum Litigators who already edit in Word and want checking inside the editor
Benchly ezBriefs with Beyond Assured Rules-based checks for hallucinated citations, formatting errors and context mismatches, plus tables of authorities $600 a year for solos, firm pricing by quote Appellate and motion practice that needs tables of authorities anyway
Clearbrief Cite Check Report Flags inaccurate or hallucinated case and record citations inside Word $300 per user per month, Solo Record-heavy litigation where the record cites matter as much as the case cites
Westlaw Quick Check and Litigation Document Analyzer Runs KeyCite across every authority in an uploaded brief, flags misstated quotations in the Advantage version Inside Westlaw plans from $170.95 a month (Edge with AI-Assisted Research) and $288.60 (Advantage), 3 year term Firms already paying for Westlaw
Lexis+ Brief Analysis Runs Shepard's on every citation and checks quotations with Quote Check Inside Lexis+ Essential from $114 a month on 3 years ($152 on 1 year) Firms already paying for Lexis+
CaseSearch No upload. Ask the question a citation was supposed to answer and get real, cited decisions with a good-law signal $49 a month, or $24 a month billed yearly Replacing a bad citation with a real case that still controls

Prices are the vendors' own published figures for new US customers, or the figure reported by the ABA Journal where noted, and they change. Free tools such as CaseRead and GroundTruth were free to use when the ABA Journal reviewed them and are left out of the price column. CaseSearch is a research tool, not legal advice.

What is the best AI citation checker for lawyers?

For most US litigators at a small firm, BriefCatch with RealityCheck is the best balance of depth and price. At 60 dollars a seat a month billed annually it checks that each citation is real, then uses AI to confirm the quoted language appears in the opinion and supports the point you cite it for. That second layer is what catches the subtle failures, a real case cited for something it never said.

The right answer still depends on how you work. If you file a handful of briefs a month, a per-document tool like CiteSentinel at 19.99 dollars a brief costs less than any subscription. If your firm already pays for Westlaw or Lexis+, the brief checker inside your plan (Quick Check, the Litigation Document Analyzer or Brief Analysis) runs the full citator on every authority and costs nothing extra. Clearbrief earns its 300 dollars a month in record-heavy litigation, where it checks the cites to your own exhibits and transcripts too.

Whatever you pick, judge it on three questions. Does it check only that the case exists, or also what the case says? Does it cover statutes and rules, or case law only? And does it tell you whether the case is still good law, which a hallucination checker on its own usually does not?

Best value for a small firm

BriefCatch Individual with RealityCheck, $60 per seat per month billed annually.

Lowest cost per filing

CiteSentinel, from $19.99 per document.

Already on a research plan

Westlaw Quick Check or Lexis+ Brief Analysis, included.

Record-heavy litigation

Clearbrief, $300 per user per month.

How do I check if AI made up a case citation?

Run the brief through a citation checker, then open every case it cannot confirm. A checker that matches the citation against a case law database will flag a case that does not exist, a real case name paired with the wrong reporter or page, and a citation whose court and year do not fit. Those are the three shapes most fabricated citations take.

Existence is only the first test. The harder problem is a real case cited for a holding it does not contain, and a pure existence check passes it. For that you need a tool that reads the opinion against your sentence (RealityCheck, the Westlaw Litigation Document Analyzer and Lexis Quote Check all attempt it) or you need to read the passage yourself. Then check treatment, because a real, accurately quoted case that has been overruled is still a bad cite.

A practical routine before filing: run the checker, resolve every red and yellow flag by pulling the opinion, confirm the pin cite says what your sentence says, and run a citator on whatever survives. Our guide to <a href="/blog/cite-checking-a-legal-brief">cite checking a legal brief</a> walks through the full pass.

Existence

Does the case exist at that reporter, volume and page?

Accuracy

Does the quoted language appear in the opinion, at the pin cite?

Support

Does the case actually hold what your sentence says it holds?

Treatment

Is it still good law, or has it been reversed, overruled or questioned?

How much does an AI citation checker cost?

On published prices, from 19.99 dollars per document to 300 dollars per user per month. CiteSentinel starts at 19.99 per document. LawDroid launched CiteCheck AI with five free reports, then 25 dollars a month for up to 100 reports or 100 dollars a month for up to 500. BriefCatch Individual is 60 dollars a seat a month billed annually, and Pro is 75 a seat with a five seat minimum. Benchly sells ezBriefs to solos for 600 dollars a year, which works out to 50 dollars a month. Clearbrief Solo is 300 dollars per user per month, with lower pricing offered for multi-year agreements.

The brief checkers inside the big research platforms are not sold on their own. The cheapest published way into one is Lexis+ Essential with Brief Analysis at 114 dollars per attorney per month on a three year term, or 152 on one year. On Westlaw, Quick Check comes with Westlaw Edge with AI-Assisted Research from 170.95 a month, and the Litigation Document Analyzer comes with Westlaw Advantage from 288.60 a month for one attorney on a single circuit, both on three year terms. The full math is on our <a href="/brief-analyzer">brief analyzer</a> comparison.

Pay per brief

CiteSentinel from $19.99 per document.

Low monthly

CiteCheck AI $25 for 100 reports, ezBriefs $50 a month on the $600 solo plan.

Editor add-ins

BriefCatch $60 to $75 a seat, Clearbrief $300 a user.

Inside a research plan

Lexis+ from $114, Westlaw from $170.95, 3 year terms.

Can Westlaw or Lexis catch AI hallucinated citations?

Yes, if you upload the brief to their brief checkers. Westlaw Quick Check and the Litigation Document Analyzer KeyCite every authority in the document, and a citation that matches nothing in Westlaw will not resolve. Lexis+ Brief Analysis runs Shepard's on every cite and Quote Check on quoted passages. Because both run a full citator, they also catch the problem a hallucination checker usually misses, a real case that is no longer good law.

They are not perfect at the subtler failure. Both flag citations that do not resolve and quotations that do not match, but a real case summarized wrongly in your own words can pass. The Stanford RegLab study of the research platforms' own AI assistants found that Lexis+ AI and Westlaw AI-Assisted Research still produced incorrect or misgrounded answers in 17 and 33 percent of test queries, which is a reminder that the checker and the drafter should not be trusted to grade each other.

Westlaw

Quick Check and the Litigation Document Analyzer, with KeyCite on every authority.

Lexis+

Brief Analysis with Shepard's and Quote Check.

Still on you

Reading the passage behind every paraphrase.

What happens if you file a brief with fake AI citations?

Courts sanction it, and the count is climbing fast. The AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by researcher Damien Charlotin listed 2,097 court decisions on October 1, 2026 in which a court found or clearly implied that a party relied on hallucinated material, up from roughly 1,490 in May 2026. The best known US example is Mata v. Avianca in the Southern District of New York in 2023, where two lawyers and their firm were fined 5,000 dollars for a brief built on cases ChatGPT invented.

Sanctions are the visible cost. The quieter ones are a motion lost on the merits, a referral to the state bar, a client relationship that ends, and a judge who reads your next filing more carefully. Against that, a checker that costs 20 to 60 dollars is cheap insurance, and ABA Formal Opinion 512 (July 2024) makes the same point state bar guidance keeps repeating: verifying every citation is the lawyer's duty no matter which tool drafted the brief.

Recorded decisions

2,097 in the Charlotin database, October 1, 2026.

Typical outcomes

Monetary sanctions, stricken filings, bar referrals, orders to notify the client.

Landmark case

Mata v. Avianca, S.D.N.Y. 2023, $5,000 sanction.

Are free AI hallucination checkers good enough to rely on?

They catch the obvious case, a citation to an opinion that does not exist, and that alone would have prevented many of the sanctions on record. CaseRead and GroundTruth were free to use when the ABA Journal reviewed them in June 2026, and LawDroid still gives five reports away. Most of them check against free public databases such as CourtListener.

Their limits are the ones to plan around. Most check case citations only, so a hallucinated statute or regulation sails through. Few read the opinion to see whether it supports your sentence, and none of the free ones tells you whether the case is still good law. Use one as a first pass if you like, but a brief going to a judge deserves a checker that tests support and treatment, and a lawyer who reads the cases.

They catch

Citations to cases that do not exist.

They miss

Statutes and rules, misquoted holdings, overruled cases.

Use them as

A first pass, never the last one.

What do you do when a citation in your draft turns out to be fake?

Find the real authority for the proposition, or cut the proposition. A checker tells you a cite is bad; it does not tell you which real case says what your sentence needs. That is a research question, and it is the one job CaseSearch is built for.

Ask the question the fake cite was meant to answer in plain English, for example whether a California court will enforce a non-solicitation clause against a former employee who never signed one, and CaseSearch returns on-point federal and state decisions with their citations, the holding in plain language and a good-law signal. You can run one real question at the top of this page with no account. After that it is 49 dollars a month, or 24 a month billed yearly, which is less than a single Westlaw month and works alongside whichever checker you choose.

CaseSearch does not scan an uploaded brief. Use a checker from the table above for that, and use CaseSearch to replace what the checker throws out with a case that is real, on point and still standing.

Checker

Finds the bad citations in the draft.

CaseSearch

Finds the real decisions that answer the same question, with a good-law signal.

You

Read the opinion and confirm the pin cite before filing.

Frequently asked

Questions buyers ask about ai citation checker

What is an AI citation checker?

An AI citation checker is software that extracts the citations from a legal brief or motion and verifies that each cited case exists, that its reporter, volume and page are correct, and in better tools that the quoted language appears in the opinion and supports the proposition. Lawyers use them to catch citations invented by generative AI before filing.

What is the cheapest AI citation checker for lawyers?

On published prices, CiteSentinel at 19.99 dollars per document is the cheapest pay-per-brief option, and LawDroid CiteCheck AI launched at 25 dollars a month for up to 100 reports after five free ones. Both are cheaper than any research platform that includes a brief checker.

Does BriefCatch check citations for AI hallucinations?

Yes. BriefCatch includes its RealityCheck citation checker in every plan, from Individual at 60 dollars per seat per month billed annually. RealityCheck validates reporter volume, court and case name, then uses AI to check that quoted language appears in the opinion and supports the cited proposition.

Does Clearbrief check for hallucinated citations?

Yes. The Clearbrief Cite Check Report evaluates the case and record citations in a document and flags potential inaccuracies or AI-generated hallucinations. Clearbrief Solo costs 300 dollars per user per month, and Clearbrief offers lower pricing on multi-year agreements.

Does an AI citation checker check statutes?

Not always. LawDroid CiteCheck AI checks case citations only and states that it does not check statutes, regulations or law review articles. Westlaw and Lexis+ brief checkers cover statutes because they run a full citator. Check the scope before you rely on a clean report.

Will a citation checker tell me if a case is still good law?

Only if it runs a citator. Westlaw Quick Check runs KeyCite and Lexis+ Brief Analysis runs Shepard's. Most standalone hallucination checkers confirm that a case exists and is quoted correctly but do not report whether it has been overruled or questioned.

How can I find a real case to replace a fake citation?

Ask the legal question the citation was meant to support in plain English. CaseSearch returns on-point federal and state decisions with citations, plain-language holdings and a good-law signal, for 49 dollars a month or 24 a month billed yearly, with one demo run that needs no account.

Start now

Replace a bad citation with a case that still controls

Ask the question your citation was meant to answer and read the on-point decisions, their citations and a good-law signal. One run needs no account. After that, 49 dollars a month or 24 billed yearly, cancel anytime. A research tool, not legal advice.

Get started